There is a major difference between the two situations. We asked Sandy Munro about it.
The video above gave us a sense that Sandy Munro addressed the Tesla Model Y design flaw we brought up on March 28. After giving thorough consideration to his words and what we said, we realized the video addresses a different concern. Sitting low was never the issue with the Model Y, because that is not the case. The design flaw is having the rear hatch exposed because the rear bumper does not protrude backward.
We have chosen the precise point in which Munro talks about that in his video, starting at 2:04. You will see he is amazed by the “aluminum rear crush plate.” That is what he decided to call that part because he had never seen anything similar until now.
A little further, Munro says this:
“I know some people said, ‘well, this is kind of low and it’ll maybe crush the hatch.’ But, you know? At the end of the day, this is higher than what a minivan is and I don’t hear a lot of complaining about that on Chrysler’s products.”
Munro is more than right, but what about the rear hatch being more exposed than it should? This is what we intended to point out, but we may have presented it in a way that made people think the design flaw was due to the opening height. This article comes precisely to clarify that.
Gallery: Tesla Model Y Design Flaw: Sitting Low Is Not The Issue; Sitting Exposed Is
We and our partners use cookies on this site to improve our service, perform analytics, personalize advertising, measure advertising performance, and remember website preferences.Ok